DESIGN MIND

 

What you decide in the beginning to be and what you do at the end is the same, is not a design mind.

What you imagine in the beginning and what you let it manifest to be in the end, is a design mind.


Ravishankar Dec 2020


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  Design is about being passionate. With a dispassionate approach in execution for a compassionate cause, visioning and negotiating with the provider, for a quality comfort of the recipient user.
Read more

“We need the Ants…..along with the Grasshoppers!”

This is in the context of design education where one is getting carried away by the florescent, gimmicky technology confused notions of innovation and design, etc….fiddling and enticed, start-ups, customized manufacturing, programmable objects, etc… ...in the meanwhile there is lots more to be done, we all know what we mean!! The country needs ants. Design professionals who are experts in providing solutions by: following a systemic process, are contextual in problem solving and giving useful, usable, desirable and empathetic solutions (opportunity vs problem is a business-friendly term agreed and needed!!). The curriculum and pedagogy of design education needs to focus on and train the ants who will sustain growth and the grasshoppers who will reveal the ‘change’ in time. We need the ants, more of them, who have the ability and are trained in the said skill sets above, while letting the grasshoppers of the lot freewheel in design :)  Ants are the support system, the ‘sth...
Read more

Navigating Creative Agency and AI Limitations: A Guide for Designers

Image
  Preamble I have been working for the last few months on Design & AI Collaboration. Observing the way AI is moving in and students of design using it, I have felt a strong need for academic to put a structure and methodology to work alongside AI. I have observed students of design are adopting the output of AI as is, not further probing or questioning the AI output in the context of the design sense, intent and goal and more importantly missing the humanistic behaviors felt and observed in the field. There seems to be lack of in-depth understanding of the HMW (how might we) AI generates to critic its relevance while the act of stating a problem statement is so engrained in insights which the designer needs to deep think to look for. The terms it generates while pattern recognition when you feed in raw data is great but have observed that the students are unable to deconstruct it and mention them without any deep thinking. The scenarios it generates are so archetypically simi...
Read more